Who are the Research Reviews for?

Our Research Reviews are useful for any health care professional wanting to learn more about rehabilitation, including: Physiotherapists / physical therapists, exercise physiologists, sports therapists, athletic trainers, S&C coaches or personal trainers, chiropractors, osteopaths, massage therapists

I’m not a physio – can I still sign up?

Of course! We may be called Physio Network, but the Research Reviews are designed for anyone wanting to keep up to date with the musculoskeletal / sports rehab literature. If that’s you, then we’re sure you’ll love the reviews!

Which countries are Research Reviews approved for CPD / CEUs in?

Research Reviews are approved for CPD/CEU points/hours in Australia, UK, USA (43 states - see below for details), Canada, New Zealand, Ireland, Austria, South Africa and more. USA - Research Reviews are approved for CEUs in all states apart from District of Columbia, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas and West Virginia. People from these states may use the guidance HERE to apply for individual approval for Research Reviews. We can provide you with materials to submit for this.

I might be interested. But can I cancel if I don't like it?

Yes! You can cancel your subscription at any time. In your 7-day free trial you can cancel anytime during the trial period and you won’t be charged. We also offer a 30-day money-back guarantee. So if you're not satisfied for any reason within that period, simply contact us and we'll send you a refund right away.

How does the trial work?

Simply subscribe to a yearly membership to the Research Reviews, enjoy the premium content, and if you don’t like what you see - you can cancel anytime before your free 7 days has passed and you won’t be charged. NB: The free trial ends exactly 7 days from when you signed up. For example if you signed up at 10:05am on Sunday (your local time) it will end at 10:05am the following Sunday (your local time).

Physiotherapy Research Reviews — 12 Studies Reviewed Monthly

Key Points

Operative and non-operative treatment showed similar clinical outcomes at one year follow-up in patients with proximal hamstring tendon avulsion (PHTA).

All key points available for members only

Start free trial

Or log in here

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Proximal hamstring tendon avulsion (PHTA) commonly occurs in people aged 45 to 59 years, with younger men most often injured in sports requiring rapid acceleration, and middle-aged women most often injured performing activities of daily living (1). PHTA is an uncommon injury comprising 12% of all hamstring injuries among athletes and has a lack of evidence-based guidelines for its management (1,2).

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of operative and non-operative treatment in patients with PHTA at 1 year follow-up using a shared decision-making model.

PHTA is an uncommon injury comprising 12% of all hamstring injuries among athletes.

Using a shared decision-making model helps achieve patient satisfaction and similar clinical outcomes for operative and non-operative treatments.

METHODS

Participants with a suspected proximal hamstring tendon injury between October 2016 and August 2019 were screened and included if they were 18 years of age or older with an MRI-confirmed PHTA.

Start free trial

to unlock full access to this review and 1109 more

Or log in here

Proximal hamstring tendon avulsions: comparable clinical outcomes of operative and non-operative treatment at 1-year follow-up using a shared decision-making model

Key Points

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

METHODS