Who are the Research Reviews for?

Our Research Reviews are useful for any health care professional wanting to learn more about rehabilitation, including: Physiotherapists / physical therapists, exercise physiologists, sports therapists, athletic trainers, S&C coaches or personal trainers, chiropractors, osteopaths, massage therapists

I’m not a physio – can I still sign up?

Of course! We may be called Physio Network, but the Research Reviews are designed for anyone wanting to keep up to date with the musculoskeletal / sports rehab literature. If that’s you, then we’re sure you’ll love the reviews!

Which countries are Research Reviews approved for CPD / CEUs in?

Research Reviews are approved for CPD/CEU points/hours in Australia, UK, USA (43 states - see below for details), Canada, New Zealand, Ireland, Austria, South Africa and more. USA - Research Reviews are approved for CEUs in all states apart from District of Columbia, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas and West Virginia. People from these states may use the guidance HERE to apply for individual approval for Research Reviews. We can provide you with materials to submit for this.

I might be interested. But can I cancel if I don't like it?

Yes! You can cancel your subscription at any time. In your 7-day free trial you can cancel anytime during the trial period and you won’t be charged. We also offer a 30-day money-back guarantee. So if you're not satisfied for any reason within that period, simply contact us and we'll send you a refund right away.

How does the trial work?

Simply subscribe to a yearly membership to the Research Reviews, enjoy the premium content, and if you don’t like what you see - you can cancel anytime before your free 7 days has passed and you won’t be charged. NB: The free trial ends exactly 7 days from when you signed up. For example if you signed up at 10:05am on Sunday (your local time) it will end at 10:05am the following Sunday (your local time).

Physiotherapy Research Reviews — 12 Studies Reviewed Monthly

Key Points

Maladaptive beliefs about imaging for musculoskeletal conditions was weakly correlated with increased pain interference.

All key points available for members only

Start free trial

Or log in here

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Patient expectations and patient outcomes can be difficult to measure but are encountered in clinical settings regularly. Imaging may not always be warranted based on other physical examinations, but patients may still desire imaging to rule out serious conditions. Clinicians have high-quality clinical practice guidelines to follow regarding the recommendations for imaging; however, patients may still believe they need imaging to achieve the best outcome.

This study aimed to determine how maladaptive imaging beliefs may be correlated with pain interference and other physical function outcome measures.

Clinicians have high-quality clinical practice guidelines to follow regarding the recommendations for imaging; however, patients may still believe they need imaging to achieve the best outcome.

Clinicians may find it helpful to address beliefs regarding pain, including beliefs regarding imaging, to determine the best course of care.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from a single healthcare system once they were scheduled for a physical therapy appointment for a musculoskeletal diagnosis.

Start free trial

to unlock full access to this review and 1109 more

Or log in here

Do maladaptive imaging beliefs predict self-reported pain interference and physical function in patients with musculoskeletal disorders?

Key Points

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

METHODS